Accra, Dec. 19, - The Ministry of
Trade and Industry Tuesday explained it was not responsible for the supposed
charges that expatriate businesses paid during the recently held Ghana
Expatriate Business Awards (GEBA) in Accra.
The Ministry denied claims by
Alhaji Muntaka Mubarak, the Member of Parliament for Asawase, that expatriate
business people paid between $25,000.00 and $100,000.00 to sit close to President
Nana Akufo-Addo.
This was in a statement signed by
Prince Boakye-Boateng, the Team Leader in charge of Communication and Advocacy
at the Ministry, and copied to the Ghana News Agency, in Accra.
The statement said the two
documents being paraded in the social media and some other platforms - the
Ministry of Trade’s letter and the Millennium Excellence Foundation Package -
had nothing in common as they were not presented to sponsors at the same time.
It said the Ministry only wrote
letters to introduce the Millennium Excellence Foundation to sponsors and
solicited support whilst the Foundation prepared the sponsorship package kits
and presented it to potential sponsors at a later date.
The Ministry explained that GEBA
was the brainchild of the Millennium Excellence Foundation, an entity noted for
its prowess and credibility in the organisation of world-class events such as
the Millennium Excellence Awards and the Accra Marathon.
The statement said, “Upon the conception
of the novel idea, the Foundation informed the Government, through the
Presidency, and further sought partnership with the Ministry of Trade and
Industry in the organisation of the first-ever awards event, targeted at
recognising and rewarding the contributions of the expatriates and naturalised
expatriate community to the socio-economic advancement of the country over the
decades.
“For the avoidance of doubt, this
is the first of its kind in Africa”.
According to the statement,
“Non-mischievous minds with a basic knowledge of event organisation will know
that as is the case with all fundraising activities, there are different
sponsorship categories and packages with their attendant benefits.
“As to how one chooses to
categorise them (whether presidential circle or platinum down to the least
package) is only a matter of semantics, nomenclature and ingenuity,” it said.
“It is very worrying for people
who are expected to know better to conveniently join the streets wagon in
pursuit of petty partisan parochial interests to churn out deliberate falsehood
to perpetuate the fallacy that access to the President has to be secured with
financial inducements.”
GNA

No comments:
Post a Comment